Social

NGDP targeting and the Taylor Rule

Chris Waller pointed out to me this morning that the NGDP target is formally equivalent to a special case of the Taylor rule. (Maybe this is generally known? I don't know.)

The argument goes as follows. Let R denote the nominal interest rate. Then the NGDP target proposes a monetary policy rule of the form:

R = R* + [log(NGDP) - log(NGDP*)]

where the starred variables denote targets.  So the rule above raises the interest rate when NGDP is above target and lowers the interest rate when NGDP is below target.

Of course, NGDP = PY, so log(NGDP) = log(P) + log(Y).

Thus, we may rewrite our policy rule in the following way:

R = R* + [log(P) +log(Y) - log(P*) - log(Y*)]

Now add and subract the lagged value of log(P) from the RHS of the equation above to get:

R = R* + [log(P) - log(P-) +log(Y) - log(P*) + log(P-) - log(Y*)]

or

R = R* + A*[log(P/P-) - log(P*/P-)]  + B*[log(Y) - log(Y*)]

So the NGDP targeting rule proposes to adjust the nominal interest rate in terms of the prevailing inflation and output gaps, with weights A = B = 1.

It seems surprising that the solution A=B=1 is generically robust. But maybe it is. In many models, A>1 is required for stability. This is the so-called Taylor principle. It is also a property of learning models; see Howitt 1992.

So maybe the NGDP targeting crowd is just saying that A should be lowered and B increased? Is that it? Have to rush off to a meeting...
 

Related Posts:

  • Den irrasjonelle presidentenAsle Toje mener i DN 3. mars at Donal Trumps straffetoll på stål er rasjonell. Toje nevner at tollen kan stimulere økonomien, bidra til et infrastrukt… Read More
  • Inflation and Unemployment (Part 2)In my previous post (Inflation and Unemployment), I reviewed what I thought was a fair characterization of the way the Federal Reserve Board staff org… Read More
  • Inflation and unemploymentThe FOMC decided on March 21 to increase the target band for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points, to a range of 1.50-1.75%. This despite inflati… Read More
  • A Heads Up For EOSI have not posted in a while. This will be a very short post and a heads up to all my readers for EOS.Why EOS?1. Dan Larrimer have proven that himself… Read More
  • What anchors inflation?Conventional wisdom is that a central bank can anchor the long-run rate of inflation to a target of its own choosing. This belief is evident where eve… Read More

0 nhận xét:

Đăng nhận xét